Overproduction Waste Becomes One Of The Seven Deadly Sins

Posted by: Daniel Stouffer  /  Category: Climate Change

Toyota has long been one of the leaders in the automobile world and long ago they identified seven separate areas of wasteful inefficiency, which can all be attributed to any manufacturing operation around the world today. These areas can really kill your profitability and expose your organization and its lack of planning in the areas of sustainability. Overproduction, transportation, waiting time, processing, inventory, motion and poor quality control must be addressed.

Make no mistake about it, because you cannot obviously see an area of waste it does not mean that it is not there. Overproduction waste is a glaring example and it’s true today that most companies pay only token lipservice to the concept of waste production. In fact, many organizations believe that overproduction is a necessary part of doing business.

Overproduction waste is simply the production of goods in quantities that are greater than demand. This position will be especially aggravated during an economic slowdown and will become very difficult to reverse. Remember that for an item to be “overproduced” it will have incurred additional elements of waste all the way down the lifecycle process, including administrative and financial loss.

In corporate culture, there is a feeling that if a production line is not utilized 100% of the time, or if particular employees are allowed to be idle at all, that this is more wasteful than letting them operate 24/7. This is a popular misconception and will at the least require a more educated assessment of equipment ROI.

Resources will be wasted needlessly wherever overproduction waste and excess is in existence. Whenever an item is produced with the intention of a sale, it has within its making an element of support, admin, backup, finance and other expense. If the item sits on the shelf, where is the profit?

A management system needs to reveal excesses as it tries to tackle overproduction waste, fundamentally by ensuring that no item can physically be produced unless the corresponding work order is actually in possession. Physically this means that the production equipment cannot engage unless it senses that a sale is in the system.

Environmental issues go alongside economic pressures, so that every company must consider how to become sustainable, as a consequence. While carbon emissions are one of the most important elements in the battle for sustainability, the entire concept must include waste reduction, less water usage and elimination of excess throughout the company.

Fully inclusive sustainability management tools could help to educate the company’s management and identify areas of inefficiency, such as overproduction waste. Such systems will almost always pay for themselves in short order.

Daniel Stouffer has much more data about your overproduction waste and how a visit to www.verisae.com will aid you.

Waste Reduction Grants Focus On Stewardship

Posted by: Daniel Stouffer  /  Category: Climate Change

Of all the states around the country, California leads in climate protection and greenhouse gas abatement. Local governments around the state have been required to reduce waste by more than 50% as compared to 1990 levels. Waste reduction grants are available for businesses, so long as they make considered efforts to mitigate the amount of waste that ends up in landfill.

According to figures issued by the state of California, the product most often finding its way into landfills as a consequence of corporate waste disposal is paper. Plastic is also another significant problem, comprising up to 25% of the waste emitted from manufacturing operations and warehouses.

California operates waste reduction grants that any businesses are eligible to apply for. There have been some dramatic results associated with the scheme, with one particular operation reporting a companywide waste reduction of 86%, saving more than $80,000 in disposal fees since inception.

The waste reduction award program in California is an example of many waste reduction grants across the country, designed to help companies that make an additional effort to alleviate the issue. Reputational boosts to the brand can be achieved and should not be underestimated. The awards program includes certificates and other material that can help to publicize the companies forward thinking.

Within the state of California, organizations that have participated in waste reduction grants and awards programs have shown that they can combine to reduce 5 1/2 million tons, which would otherwise have made it to landfill. This results in a huge reduction in carbon emissions, but also cuts back on real costs for the business associated with disposal and transportation.

At boardroom level, an organization should compose an active waste reduction strategy and should stick to it. There are a number of different incentives available such as the California Materials Exchange, which is a service that looks for markets for nonhazardous materials that would otherwise have been disposed of.

Environmental stewardship is displayed by an organization that has an active waste reduction strategy. Landfill space is at a premium and as such, costs associated with disposal can only rise. As the government threatens legislation or carbon taxation, emissions associated with waste will undoubtedly result in an additional cost for the company to consider.

Any organization that shows innovation when establishing a waste reduction project can apply to its local jurisdiction for waste reduction grants.

Daniel Stouffer has a lot of information about your waste reduction grants and how a visit to www.verisae.com will benefit you.

What Is Your Waste Reduction Strategy?

Posted by: Daniel Stouffer  /  Category: Climate Change

Any company that comes up with a meaningful waste reduction strategy can cut back on costs considerably, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. A recent, landmark study composed by the Agency reveals how carbon emissions can be drastically reduced if a real, waste reduction and recycling program is in place. The study, taking place in 2009, considered emissions throughout the lifecycle of events, for the information.

The EPA’s waste reduction strategy findings are quite amazing in many respects. If construction debris is recycled it could save as much carbon emission as the entire carbon footprint of the state of North Carolina — some 150 million metric tons. A solid waste reduction strategy is just as important as an expanded lifespan projection.

More and more environmentally conscious observers are pushing for the United States to adopt responsibility laws, ensuring that an individual organization’s waste reduction strategy is anchored securely. By doing so, producers would be responsible for their products not only during production and through use, but also during destruction as well.

A waste reduction strategy should be an integral part of a lifecycle analysis for each and every product. The disposal of waste results in dedicated costs for the organization and puts a sometimes unnecessary imposition upon municipalities and jurisdictions.

Excess waste is responsible for a considerable amount of the greenhouse gas emissions in a developed society. Methane in particular is a byproduct of decomposition. While most attention is paid to the first two emissions scopes, more attention will be paid over the years ahead to the third scope, including supply-chain and afterlife product handling.

The EPA suggests that procurement, production, delivery and disposal of goods and services by Americans account for 42% of the entire greenhouse gas emissions footprint for the nation as a whole. This includes emissions through land use, food and product production throughout a lifecycle.

Every organization should be aware of the size of its entire carbon footprint and should thus be in possession of information relating to an entire supply chain and waste reduction strategy. Retailer Wal-Mart drew attention to the importance of supply-chain emissions when the company requested all of its suppliers, worldwide to reveal their carbon handling policies.

The push for sustainability includes an active waste reduction strategy, with the ultimate goal of near zero when it comes to landfill delivery. Companies should also aim for biodegradable product use and recycling, where available.

Daniel Stouffer has a lot of information about your waste reduction strategy and how a visit to www.verisae.com will be of use to you.