Solar Energy It is So Popular. So Why is it Not Yet Widely Used?
Posted by: Larry Wood / Category: Global WarmingThe truth is, the 350,000,000 terawatts of energy obtainable from the sun is so large that an exposure to a full sun in only 15 minutes will be sufficient to generate the world’s energy requirement
Compare that with energy that is generated by nuclear and fossil fuel. Presently, the obtainable data for fossil and nuclear fuel is 10,800,000 terawatts which we all realize to become non renewable.
To produce electricity, utility companies burn fossil fuels that translate to 1.3 pounds of carbon dioxide to produce 1kw of electrical power. This unwanted CO2 emissions are dumped into the atmosphere. This then translates into each typical home being accountable yearly for 22,000 pounds of CO2 emissions.
The harnessing of the sun’s rays is clean and safe. It produces no emissions and it’s practical and may within the years ahead, prove very economical. Within the United States, only 0.1% of power that is generated is solar energy driven. And so what are the obstacles?
According to the Wall Street Journal (in an article that was released in its August 2008 concern), you will find groups, backed by political groups that are lobbying against the putting up of transmission lines for solar energy. The construction of distribution lines for solar energy is also becoming blocked by environmental activists that restrict the delivering of solar energy to these who want it in their homes.
An additional obstacle is that the power grid in the United States which was created a lot more than 100 years ago is now so congested in many regions. To deliver the pv power to consumers, scientists and engineers will need to come out with an additional cost efficient plan to transfer large amounts of power from one location to another.
Solar panels are considered expensive. Even though a house increases its value by folds when solar powered, the costs still could be prohibitive to most that unless the non silicon flexible pv panels which are now becoming produced are released for marketplace consumption, powering homes through solar energy could nevertheless be very limited.
Other forms of rewards to prevent fossil fuel use should nevertheless be effectively placed. The 30% tax cut to projected cost previously awarded will be a lot more attractive if other federal credits are included to encourage further investments.
The global warming concern that has been brought to the papers is really a recurrent subject of talk shows and remains to be a great news item. Also, the too unstable pump costs, should and for most part, already be a great incentive to use this alternative source of energy.
However, efficient solar energy transmission to homes will stay to be very difficult unless these obstacles are breached. Assuming that these obstacles are solved these days, it will still take some years to convert 20% of American houses into solar energy users. Meanwhile, solar panels on individual houses stay to become the most viable option.
The good part to solar energy quest is that technologies is advancing very rapidly. Nano technologies for solar energy is becoming developed and may be available in five years time. Other breakthroughs in cell designs are also being produced that could, in the next few many years, be a cost-effective way of generating power without having having to rely anymore on fossil and nuclear power.
Lastly, you got to check out the Energy Saving method that save the earth and my bill too. I didn’t know that I can make my own solar panel that only costs me less than one thousand dollar.
